Ex-NITI Aayog vice-chair says Apple sought Chinese vendors for India

Rajiv Kumar said Apple wanted to bring Chinese suppliers into India during expansion discussions, using the example to argue for a more open approach to Chinese FDI and anchor investors.

— Source publishedSun, 6 Sept, 2026, 17:19 IST·First seen Sun, 6 Sept, 2026, 17:50 IST·Source Business Today · Latest

What happened

Former NITI Aayog vice-chairman Rajiv Kumar said Apple was allowed to bring Chinese vendors into India during its expansion discussions, and urged India to

Key facts

  • $2 billion
  • $250 billion
  • 2018
  • September 2017 to April 2022

Why this matters

Multinationals should structure India supplier and joint-venture plans with contingencies for Chinese partner approvals while cultivating alternative local and non-Chinese vendors.

What to watch

  • Changes to Press Note 3 approval procedures, sector-specific exemptions, or published timelines for Chinese FDI applications.
  • Approval, rejection, or prolonged delay of Chinese-linked investments in Apple’s Indian supplier network.
  • New PLI awards or customs-duty changes targeting electronics components, displays, batteries, camera modules, and semiconductor packaging.
  • Announcements of India manufacturing or supplier investments by Apple, Foxconn, Tata Electronics, Pegatron, Luxshare, or major component vendors.
  • Evidence that India-made iPhone models gain a higher domestic component share, faster launch availability, or improved export volumes.
  • Escalation in India-China diplomatic or border tensions, which would reduce the odds of policy flexibility.
  • Apple and its assemblers increase engagement with central and state governments on component localization, supplier approvals, and production-linked incentives.
  • Chinese electronics-component firms explore minority stakes, technology licensing, joint ventures, and India-based partnerships designed to clear FDI scrutiny.
  • Indian contract manufacturers and component makers seek partnerships with Taiwanese, Japanese, Korean, and Chinese technology providers to capture localization demand.
  • Rival global electronics brands use Apple’s case to lobby for predictable supplier-investment rules, especially for semiconductors, displays, batteries, cameras, and precision tooling.
  • Retail pricing and product-launch teams monitor whether localized sourcing lowers India iPhone costs or instead creates interim cost pressure from fragmented supply chains.