FMCG distributors urge government to retain zero-MDR UPI payments for merchants

AICPDF says a proposed 0.4% MDR on UPI receipts could compress already-thin FMCG trade margins. The body has sought B2B supply-chain exemptions, GST relief and clarity that the ₹1 lakh monthly receipt threshold will not create retrospective liability.

— Source publishedFri, 18 Sept, 2026, 11:45 IST·First seen Fri, 18 Sept, 2026, 11:51 IST·Source The Hindu BusinessLine

What happened

AICPDF urged the government to retain zero-MDR UPI for merchants, warning a 0.4% charge would erode thin FMCG trade margins. It sought B2B supply-chain exemptions, GST relief, pre-tax MDR calculation and clarity that the ₹1 lakh threshold carries no retrospective liability.

Key facts

  • ₹1 lakh monthly UPI receipt threshold
  • ₹328 lakh crore approximate UPI transaction value
  • ₹20,700 crore estimated UPI ecosystem operating cost
  • 0.06% estimated aggregate operating cost as share of transaction value
  • 0.4% proposed MDR concern
  • ₹5 flat MDR for specified essential and thin-margin sectors

Why this matters

Any MDR-led pressure on distributors could increase demand for embedded payments, B2B credit and supply-chain platforms that offset transaction costs or improve trade economics.

What to watch

  • Finance Ministry, RBI or NPCI consultation papers specifying MDR rates, merchant thresholds and effective dates.
  • Clarification on whether the proposed ₹1 lakh monthly receipt threshold is measured per merchant, per QR code, per account or across entities.
  • Any explicit exemption for GST-registered B2B supply-chain payments, FMCG distributors, essential-goods merchants or small businesses.
  • Union Budget or supplementary allocation for UPI incentive reimbursement to banks and payment service providers.
  • Changes in UPI commercial-transaction volumes, bank-transfer substitution, merchant QR acceptance, and distributor payment-term negotiations.
  • Industry announcements of transaction surcharges, minimum-order values, or discounts for non-UPI settlement.
  • AICPDF and allied trade bodies intensify lobbying for permanent zero MDR, explicit B2B exemptions and prospective-only enforcement.
  • Large distributors map UPI receipt volumes by counterparty and ticket size, preparing to shift high-value collections toward IMPS, NEFT, RTGS or direct bank-transfer mandates.
  • FMCG companies face distributor demands for higher margins, payment-cost reimbursement or revised settlement terms if MDR appears likely.
  • Payment apps, acquirers and banks lobby for either MDR restoration, direct government subsidy, or differentiated pricing for commercial use cases.
  • Retailers and distributors may increase incentives for cash, bank transfer and credit-led settlement if payment acceptance costs rise.