FSSAI proposes front-of-pack warning labels with one-year compliance window

India’s food regulator has proposed red hexagonal front-of-pack warnings for packaged foods high in added sugar, fat or salt. Draft rules could be finalised in about four months, followed by a minimum 365-day transition for food businesses.

— Source publishedWed, 23 Sept, 2026, 20:36 IST·First seen Wed, 23 Sept, 2026, 20:53 IST·Source ET Small Business

What happened

FSSAI proposed single-phase front-of-pack warnings for packaged foods high in added sugar, fat or salt. Food businesses would receive a one-year transition

Key facts

  • Approximately 4 months to issue and finalise draft regulations
  • 365-day minimum transition period
  • 1 year for food business operators to comply
  • Added sugar threshold for beverages: more than 2g per 100ml
  • Salt threshold for beverages: more than 175mg per 100ml
  • Added fat threshold for chips: more than 4.2g per 100g
  • Salt threshold for chips: more than 625mg per 100g
  • Sugar threshold: 5% energy from added sugar
  • Fat threshold: 15% energy from added fat

Why this matters

Target reformulation capabilities, healthier product portfolios and packaging-compliance partners, as the rules could accelerate consolidation around better-for-you assets.

What to watch

  • Publication of the final FSSAI notification and whether the proposed red hexagon design survives unchanged.
  • Final nutrient thresholds, serving-size rules, exemptions and treatment of products with naturally occurring versus added sugar, fat or sodium.
  • Confirmation of the effective date and whether the minimum 365-day transition is counted from notification or a separately specified rollout date.
  • Legal challenges or coordinated lobbying by packaged-food, beverage, dairy and snack-food industry groups.
  • Competitor reformulation announcements, especially by market leaders in beverages, biscuits, snacks, instant noodles and breakfast foods.
  • Retailer requests for earlier compliance, private-label reformulation activity and e-commerce adoption of front-of-pack warning visibility.
  • Consumer-research evidence on warning-label effects on repeat purchase, particularly among urban and health-conscious households.
  • Create an SKU-level exposure map using proposed added-sugar, salt and fat thresholds; prioritize high-revenue products likely to receive multiple warnings.
  • Freeze nonessential packaging refreshes until final label specifications are known, while reserving artwork, printing and inventory-writeoff budgets.
  • Begin reformulation feasibility tests for hero SKUs, focusing on changes that avoid a warning without impairing taste, shelf life or price architecture.
  • Negotiate flexible packaging-print contracts and run down legacy printed-pack inventory ahead of the eventual transition deadline.
  • Prepare retailer and e-commerce execution plans, including product-page nutrition disclosures, assortment alternatives and promotional support for reformulated or warning-free variants.
  • Model margin risk from reformulation ingredients, new tooling, relabelling, compliance testing and potential volume pressure in highly exposed categories.