India probes LG and Samsung over OLED TV-parts duty claims

India’s Directorate of Revenue Intelligence is examining whether LG and Samsung improperly used a 5% concessional import tariff for OLED TV display parts, versus a 15% rate sought by authorities. The case could lift premium-TV input costs as industry groups lobby for duty parity on OLED components and equipment.

— Source publishedWed, 23 Sept, 2026, 16:05 IST·First seen Wed, 23 Sept, 2026, 16:13 IST·Source Business Standard · Companies

What happened

India is investigating LG Electronics and Samsung over alleged underpayment of import duties on OLED TV display parts. The dispute could raise premium-TV input

Key facts

  • 5% concessional import tariff claimed
  • 15% duty sought by Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
  • India TV market worth $4.7 billion last year
  • OLED TVs had nearly 4% India TV market share
  • LG India TV market share around 26%
  • LG OLED value share almost 59%
  • Samsung 65-inch OLED TV priced at $2,415
  • Samsung is contesting a separate $520 million tax demand
  • Display imports rose 15% to $5.6 billion by March 2026
  • Penalties can reach 100% of duty evaded

Why this matters

The tariff dispute increases the strategic value of India-based OLED component assembly, local partnerships and supply-chain investments that can reduce import-duty exposure.

What to watch

  • DRI show-cause notices, quantified duty demands or reported seizures.
  • Finance Ministry or CBIC tariff-classification guidance on OLED display parts.
  • Any budget, customs notification or trade-policy move changing the 5% and 15% duty treatment.
  • Public disclosures of provisions, contingent liabilities or pricing changes by LG, Samsung and major TV retailers.
  • Industry association statements tying OLED duty parity to local manufacturing commitments.
  • LG and Samsung likely contest product classification, submit technical documentation and seek administrative or judicial relief.
  • Manufacturers may slow OLED SKU expansion, trim dealer incentives and prioritize larger-margin premium models.
  • Industry bodies are likely to intensify lobbying for a unified lower duty on OLED panels, parts and production equipment.
  • Competitors may reassess India sourcing, increase localization discussions and shift promotions toward LCD/mini-LED models if OLED economics worsen.