Irdai’s proposed expense caps could squeeze small insurers’ customer acquisition

Irdai’s consultation on standardised commission and expense-management limits may curb acquisition spending by smaller and newer insurers, while benefiting larger incumbents with lower expense ratios. The proposal could accelerate consolidation in insurance distribution.

— Source publishedThu, 24 Sept, 2026, 17:46 IST·First seen Thu, 24 Sept, 2026, 18:08 IST·Source Financial Express · BrandWagon

What happened

Irdai has proposed standardised commission caps and tighter expense-management limits. Insurers warn the rules could curb customer-acquisition spending by small and new players, favour larger incumbents and drive consolidation in India’s insurance market.

Key facts

  • 15% EoM limit of GDPI proposed for life insurers
  • 20% EoM limit of GDPI proposed for general insurers, down from 30%
  • 30% EoM limit proposed for standalone health insurers, down from 35%
  • Large general insurer with 10% market share had 23% total expense-to-GDPI ratio in FY26
  • Insurers with less than 1% market share had 40% expense-to-GDPI ratio in FY26
  • Individual life first-year average commissions ranged from 14% to 51%
  • General-insurance average commissions ranged from 6% to 29%

Why this matters

Tighter acquisition economics may create consolidation opportunities in insurers and distribution platforms as smaller players seek scale, capital or lower-cost channels.

What to watch

  • Final Irdai EoM rules, effective date, transition provisions, and any exemptions for new entrants or product lines.
  • Reported expense-to-GDPI ratios, commission expense, new-business growth, and market-share changes for insurers below 1% share.
  • Changes in agent commissions, broker remuneration, bancassurance agreements, and customer acquisition-cost disclosures.
  • M&A, capital raises, portfolio transfers, distribution tie-ups, or exits involving smaller life, general, and standalone health insurers.
  • Evidence of premium increases, reduced promotional spending, narrower underwriting appetite, or lower availability of niche retail products.
  • Favor distribution partnerships with large insurers, banks, and established brokers that can sustain customer acquisition within lower expense limits.
  • Reassess exposure to small insurers and insurtech distributors dependent on high commissions, cashbacks, aggressive agent payouts, or paid digital acquisition.
  • Expect tighter distributor contracts, lower upfront commissions, greater renewal-linked compensation, and stronger emphasis on cross-sell and persistency.
  • Monitor whether large insurers use lower relative expense burdens to increase agent recruitment, broker payouts within caps, and brand-led marketing.
  • Prepare for product rationalization among smaller carriers, especially low-margin or high-acquisition-cost retail health and protection offerings.