Maharashtra orders crackdown on highway RoW dhabas and eateries

Maharashtra has barred dhabas, restaurants and other commercial establishments within national and state highway right-of-way zones. Local bodies must review licences within 30 days and remove unauthorised structures within 60 days, creating immediate compliance risk for roadside food-service operators.

— Source publishedTue, 11 Aug, 2026, 12:18 IST·First seen Tue, 11 Aug, 2026, 13:26 IST·Source NDTV Profit

The development

Maharashtra has barred dhabas, restaurants and commercial establishments within national and state highway right-of-way zones. Local bodies must review licences within 30 days and remove unauthorised structures within 60 days, affecting roadside food-service operators and highway-access businesses.

The numbers

  • 60 days
  • 30 days

Why it matters to operators and investors

Pause or reprice acquisitions, leases and partnerships tied to Maharashtra highway locations until right-of-way compliance, permitting and relocation options are fully diligenced.

What to watch next

  • District-wise lists of establishments receiving licence-review notices or removal orders.
  • Official publication of highway right-of-way maps, corridor definitions and treatment of service-road, frontage-road and fuel-station sites.
  • Whether authorities allow regularisation, relocation windows, setback corrections or only demolition/removal.
  • Court stays, trade-association challenges and state-level clarifications on enforcement powers.
  • Closure counts and traffic diversion patterns on high-volume Mumbai-Pune, Mumbai-Nashik, Mumbai-Ahmedabad, Pune-Bengaluru and Nagpur corridor routes.
  • Demand and lease-price changes for compliant wayside facilities, petrol-pump food outlets and town-edge restaurant sites.
  • Evidence of similar right-of-way enforcement being adopted by other states or expanded to retail, warehousing and vehicle-service establishments.
  • Map every Maharashtra highway-facing outlet, franchisee, supplier-dependent customer and planned site against notified national and state highway right-of-way boundaries.
  • Freeze or re-underwrite new highway-adjacent leases, buildouts and acquisitions until land title, setback, access-road and local-body permissions are independently verified.
  • Prepare contingency plans for affected outlets: relocation to service roads or town-edge parcels, modular asset recovery, employee redeployment and inventory rerouting.
  • Engage district authorities and highway agencies early to validate demarcation, licence status and whether corrective actions can preserve operations.
  • Shift near-term marketing, distribution and roadside expansion investment toward compliant fuel-retail forecourts, designated wayside amenities and non-right-of-way locations.
  • Assess exposure among food distributors, beverage suppliers, quick-service franchisees and consumer brands reliant on dhaba channels; adjust sales forecasts and credit terms in affected corridors.

The counter-case

The immediate closure risk may be overstated: the order appears targeted at establishments physically inside the legally defined highway right-of-way, not all roadside dhabas or businesses dependent on highway traffic. Many operators may sit on privately held land outside the RoW, have legacy approvals, or be able to regularise access and structures. Enforcement could also be uneven across districts, slowed by land-title disputes, political resistance, court challenges and limited local-body capacity. Even removals may shift demand to compliant nearby outlets rather than materially reducing roadside foodservice demand.