Maharashtra traders plan October 2 ‘No UPI Day’ over proposed MDR fee

Trader bodies in Maharashtra are calling for cash-only transactions on October 2, protesting a proposed 0.4% charge on UPI payments above ₹2,000. The action follows similar merchant protests in Madhya Pradesh and could temporarily disrupt digital-payment acceptance at participating stores.

— Source publishedThu, 24 Sept, 2026, 17:26 IST·First seen Thu, 24 Sept, 2026, 17:33 IST·Source Mint · Money

What happened

Maharashtra traders plan a cash-only No UPI Day on October 2 to protest a proposed 0.4% fee on UPI payments above ₹2,000. The action follows similar protests in Madhya Pradesh, with traders seeking withdrawal of MDR charges.

Key facts

  • 0.4% fee on UPI transactions above ₹2,000
  • 20,000 traders
  • October 2
  • September 28-30, 2026
  • October 15
  • ₹2,000 UPI transactions remain MDR-free

Why this matters

The MDR backlash highlights an opportunity for acquirers and fintechs to deepen merchant partnerships with pricing models that protect small-ticket digital-payment economics.

What to watch

  • Formal government, NPCI, RBI, or finance-ministry clarification on whether a 0.4% MDR proposal exists, its scope, and implementation timetable.
  • Participation estimates and geographic spread of the October 2 action, especially adoption by Mumbai, Pune, Nagpur, and organized retail associations.
  • Whether trader groups in additional states announce aligned cash-only days or indefinite UPI boycotts.
  • UPI transaction-value and transaction-count deviations around the protest date, alongside ATM withdrawals and cash demand.
  • Any exemption threshold changes, merchant subsidy announcements, or commitment to fund UPI operating costs without MDR.
  • Public statements from banks, payment aggregators, QR providers, and major retail chains on fee pass-through or acceptance policy.
  • Retailers should prepare a cash-handling contingency for October 2: float sizing, change availability, cashier guidance, and security coverage.
  • Payment teams should map exposure by store, merchant category, transaction size, and UPI dependency; prioritize continuity plans for locations likely to participate.
  • Acquirers and fintechs should proactively communicate whether proposed charges would apply, who bears them, and whether merchant-specific exemptions or threshold rules are possible.
  • Large chains should avoid abrupt UPI refusal, but prepare clear customer messaging and alternate tender routing if local merchant associations call for participation.
  • Monitor whether informal customer surcharges or cash-only policies create consumer-protection, tax-compliance, or brand-risk issues.