India proposes ending zero-MDR rule for UPI, raising a potential cost for large merchants

The Finance Ministry has proposed removing the zero-MDR mandate on UPI and RuPay debit-card payments. Consumers are expected to remain fee-free, but merchant charges, rates and covered transaction categories would be notified only after the amendment is passed.

— Source publishedMon, 3 Aug, 2026, 23:05 IST·First seen Mon, 3 Aug, 2026, 23:14 IST·Source Mint · Money

What happened

Finance Ministry has proposed removing the zero-MDR mandate for UPI, potentially shifting payment-processing costs to merchants while keeping consumers

Key facts

  • 0% MDR on UPI and RuPay debit-card transactions since 2020
  • UPI MDR of 0.3% for large merchants proposed by Payments Council of India
  • ₹1,500 crore government incentives
  • ₹10,000 crore estimated annual cost to maintain and expand UPI
  • 88% of India's digital transactions are UPI-based
  • 23 billion-plus monthly UPI transactions
  • around ₹30 lakh crore monthly UPI transaction value
  • 600 million additional users forecast
  • 100-150 billion projected monthly transactions
  • 23.66 billion UPI transactions in July 2026
  • ₹29.88 lakh crore UPI transaction value in July 2026
  • 19% annual value growth in July 2026

Why this matters

The policy could increase the strategic value of payments infrastructure, merchant-acquiring capabilities and UPI-adjacent partnerships as retailers seek to manage new processing costs.

What to watch

  • Publication of amendment text defining whether MDR is mandatory, optional, capped, or merchant-category-specific.
  • Finance Ministry or RBI notification of MDR rates, transaction thresholds, merchant-size definitions, and implementation dates.
  • Whether RuPay debit and UPI receive identical treatment or separate pricing structures.
  • Government commitments to continue or replace incentive subsidies for banks, PSPs, and UPI infrastructure.
  • Statements from major merchant associations, e-commerce platforms, banks, NPCI, and payment aggregators on pass-through risk.
  • Changes in UPI transaction growth, average ticket size, acceptance expansion, and bank/PSP economics ahead of implementation.
  • Any carve-outs for P2M small-value payments, government services, fuel, utilities, education, healthcare, or essential retail.
  • Model UPI and RuPay debit volumes by store format, ticket size, category margin, and acquiring partner to quantify potential basis-point exposure.
  • Prepare payment-routing and tender-steering options for high-cost use cases while preserving a fee-free consumer checkout experience.
  • Reopen acquirer, PSP, and bank negotiations early; seek volume-based MDR caps, category exclusions, and service-level commitments.
  • Review retailer-funded loyalty, cashback, and UPI promotion economics, which may become less attractive if merchants also pay transaction charges.
  • Join industry representation efforts focused on exemptions for small-ticket, essential-goods, and micro-merchant transactions.
  • Update pricing and margin-contingency plans for categories where payment costs cannot be absorbed easily, especially grocery, value retail, and marketplace orders.