Insurers seek phased commission reforms and scale-based expense caps

Indian insurers, including Generali Central, are urging IRDAI to phase in proposed commission and expense-of-management curbs, arguing that uniform caps could disproportionately raise acquisition and distribution pressure on smaller and newer players.

— Source publishedFri, 25 Sept, 2026, 17:55 IST·First seen Fri, 25 Sept, 2026, 18:15 IST·Source Financial Express · BrandWagon

What happened

Generali Central Insurance · Indian insurers seek a phased rollout and softer final IRDAI commission caps. Generali Central executives also want scale-based

Key facts

  • Term insurance commission proposed at 25-30%, down from 51%
  • Health insurance commission proposed at 15-20%, down from 24%
  • Motor insurance commission proposed at 0-15%, down from 26%
  • Savings-plan commission proposed at 5-25%, versus 14-37%
  • Life-insurer EoM cap proposed at 15% within two years and 12.5% within five years, from 30-35%
  • General-insurer EoM cap proposed at 20% of GDPI over five years, from 30% of GWP
  • Standalone health-insurer EoM cap proposed at 30%, from 35%

Why this matters

Size-linked expense limits could accelerate consolidation, making subscale insurers and distribution platforms more strategic targets for buyers seeking scale, cost synergies and broader channel reach.

What to watch

  • IRDAI consultation language on whether caps apply uniformly, by insurer age/scale, by product line, or through overall portfolio-level limits.
  • Final transition timeline for life insurers moving toward a 12.5% expense cap and any grandfathering of existing distributor contracts.
  • Rules on commission flexibility for term, health, motor, annuity and savings products, where channel dependence differs materially.
  • Comments or objections from major bancassurance partners, broker associations, agent bodies and public-sector insurers.
  • Quarterly trends in commission expense, expense ratios, new-business premiums, agent additions and persistency at smaller private insurers.
  • Insurer announcements involving branch closures, agency rationalization, distributor-contract revisions or increased digital acquisition spending.
  • Any concurrent IRDAI measures to improve product comparability, disclosure, embedded distribution or protection-product penetration.
  • Life insurers will rebalance sales incentives toward protection, persistency and renewal-linked payouts rather than upfront commissions, especially in savings-linked products.
  • Smaller insurers will seek bancassurance, employer-group, affinity and digital partnerships that lower fixed agency and branch costs.
  • Large insurers with scaled captive distribution, strong brand pull and lower unit costs will use the transition to gain share from subscale competitors.
  • Agents, brokers and corporate distributors will steer business toward products and carriers that preserve net remuneration, potentially reducing product neutrality during the transition.
  • Insurers will simplify product portfolios, cut low-margin variants and tighten underwriting or pricing in health and motor where acquisition costs are hardest to absorb.
  • Insurtechs, web aggregators and embedded-insurance platforms may gain negotiating leverage if insurers redirect acquisition spending from traditional commissions to measurable digital channels.
  • Potentially weaker new-business margins and slower agent recruitment could reduce near-term insurance penetration growth, particularly in underinsured tier-2 and tier-3 markets.