Red Bull challenges FSSAI’s ‘energy’ label order as beverage makers race to comply

Red Bull has moved the Delhi High Court against FSSAI’s 90-day direction restricting use of “energy” on labels. Reliance Consumer launched Campa Xtra without the term, while PepsiCo is withdrawing Sting stock as the ₹9,500 crore category adjusts.

— Source publishedTue, 29 Sept, 2026, 08:17 IST·First seen Tue, 29 Sept, 2026, 10:17 IST·Source ET Retail

The brand move

Red Bull challenged FSSAI's 90-day order, running through September 30, barring the 'energy' label in the Delhi High Court. Reliance launched Campa Xtra without the term, while PepsiCo withdraws Sting stock; the category is estimated at ₹9,500 crore.

The numbers

  • 90-day
  • September 30
  • 2024
  • close to a year
  • millions
  • ₹9,500 crore
  • more than ₹2,000 crore
  • three

Why it matters for the brand

The regulatory reset creates openings to acquire, partner with or scale compliant stimulant-beverage brands positioned beyond the restricted “energy” label.

What to track next

  • Delhi High Court decision on interim relief, including whether it stays the 90-day direction.
  • FSSAI clarification on permissible alternatives to 'energy', including 'energy drink', 'energy beverage', caffeine references and functional claims.
  • Evidence of state-level inspections, notices, product seizures or retailer compliance audits after the deadline.
  • PepsiCo's Sting withdrawal scope, relaunch timing and any revised brand architecture.
  • Price promotions, out-of-stock rates and shelf-space shifts across modern trade, quick commerce and kirana channels.
  • Competitor launches using terms such as 'Xtra', 'charged', 'active', 'caffeine' or 'performance' and FSSAI's response.
  • Red Bull, PepsiCo and other incumbents will pursue court, regulatory and industry-association channels while preparing contingency packs.
  • Brands will migrate messaging toward caffeine content, alertness-adjacent but legally vetted claims, hydration, flavor and lifestyle occasions.
  • Retailers and distributors will prioritize compliant inventory, demand indemnities from suppliers and mark down legacy packs before the deadline.
  • Reliance Consumer and regional challengers will use compliant launches to gain listings and trial while incumbent stock is withdrawn or repackaged.
  • Packaging converters, label printers and co-packers will face a short-cycle demand spike, potentially creating lead-time constraints.

The counter-case

The disruption may be overstated: changing front-label language does not necessarily alter demand for caffeine-led beverages, whose purchase drivers are taste, price, distribution and brand recognition. Large incumbents can absorb packaging redesigns and channel inventory transitions, while a court stay or clarification could materially soften the 90-day impact.