SBI Research sees states gaining ₹1.43 lakh crore despite GST cess expiry

SBI Research projects a ₹1.43 lakh crore net gain for states in FY27 as higher GST collections and basic excise sharing offset the end of compensation-cess transfers. Higher GST on specified demerit goods is expected to support state receipts.

— Source publishedFri, 24 Jul, 2026, 17:19 IST·First seen Fri, 24 Jul, 2026, 17:41 IST·Source Business Today · Latest

What happened

SBI Research says states will gain ₹1.43 lakh crore in FY27 despite the GST compensation cess ending, as higher GST collections and basic excise-duty sharing

Key facts

  • ₹1.43 lakh crore projected net gain for states in FY27
  • ₹19.1 lakh crore projected state GST and basic excise share in FY27
  • ₹17.7 lakh crore state GST and basic excise share in FY26
  • ₹21,000 crore hypothetical state loss from AED revenue sharing
  • GST rate on specified demerit goods increased from 28% to 40%
  • FY26 GST revenue growth: 5.6%
  • FY25 GST revenue growth: 9.4%
  • FY27 Q1 GST growth: 1.5% including cess impact; 8.4% excluding it
  • Projected annual GST collection growth: 8-9%

Why this matters

Corporate development teams should factor potentially stronger state balance sheets into market-prioritization and partnership decisions, particularly in states where public spending can accelerate retail infrastructure and consumption.

What to watch

  • FY27 state budget revisions showing whether incremental receipts fund capex, welfare transfers, tax relief or deficit reduction.
  • Monthly GST collections and the share attributable to demerit goods after the February 1, 2026 cess expiry.
  • Final GST Council or Finance Ministry notifications defining affected demerit goods, applicable rates and transition rules.
  • State-level excise and GST settlement data, particularly for high-consumption states.
  • Retail scanner data for price elasticity, downtrading and organized-versus-unorganized share shifts in affected categories.
  • Any increase in GST audits, e-invoicing enforcement or anti-profiteering action following rate changes.
  • Model state-by-state exposure rather than treating the GST-receipts increase as a uniform national consumption catalyst.
  • For retailers selling affected demerit categories, prepare price-pack architecture, smaller pack sizes and substitute-SKU plans to protect volumes.
  • Increase scrutiny of input-tax-credit, invoicing and distributor compliance as states seek to preserve the projected revenue gain.
  • Favor retail formats exposed to value consumption, food, household essentials, building materials and state-capex corridors over categories directly exposed to demerit-tax increases.
  • Track whether brands absorb tax increases through trade margins, promotional funding or reduced pack weights before changing retail price assumptions.