Trader groups withdraw 'No UPI Day' call after meeting Sitharaman

AIMRA and AICPDF withdrew their October 2 'No UPI Day' protest after meeting Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman. They sought a phased MDR rollout starting at 0.20% in FY 2026-27, a ₹5 lakh threshold and exemptions for merchant-to-merchant transfers.

Source published First seen

Read the source at Outlook Businessoutlookbusiness.com

Also reported by ET Small Business (economictimes.indiatimes.com)

Channel facts

Figures in the source Around 200.05%0.40%₹1 lakh0.4%₹2,000October 15

What it means for online and offline

Stress-test payments partnerships and acquisition targets under alternative MDR scenarios, including the requested merchant-to-merchant exemptions, without treating trader demands as settled policy.

Signals to track

  • Official government, RBI or NPCI announcements distinguishing consultation from approved policy.
  • Confirmation, rejection or modification of the requested 0.20% rate and FY 2026–27 timing.
  • Definitions and eligibility rules for merchant-to-merchant exemptions, including safeguards against transaction reclassification.
  • Renewed boycott notices or observable changes in merchant UPI acceptance.
  • Provider contract notices specifying fee incidence and revenue allocation.

Likely next moves

The desk's read of what comes next — analysis, not reported by the source.

  • Trader bodies seek written commitments on the proposed rollout timetable and merchant-to-merchant exemptions.
  • Retailers model exposure by channel, transaction value and supplier-payment flows without treating the requested rate as enacted.
  • Banks and payment providers prepare alternative pricing and classification approaches if formal consultation begins.

The counter-case

The withdrawal removes a threatened disruption but does not establish a payments-policy shift. The proposed 0.20% MDR and merchant-to-merchant exemptions remain trader demands, so projecting changes to retailer costs, payment-provider revenue or omni-channel strategy would be premature. If boycott participation was likely to be limited, even the immediate operational significance may be modest.