Zee sues Blinkit over alleged unauthorised music use in Instagram promotions

Zee Entertainment has filed a copyright case against Blinkit in the Delhi High Court, alleging that the quick-commerce platform used Zee-owned music in commercial Instagram promotions without permission. Blinkit has been summoned and must respond within 30 days; the next hearing is set for August 27.

— Source publishedWed, 5 Aug, 2026, 11:55 IST·First seen Wed, 5 Aug, 2026, 12:17 IST·Source Medianama

What happened

Zee Entertainment has sued Blinkit in the Delhi High Court, alleging the quick-commerce platform used Zee-owned music in commercial Instagram promotions without

Key facts

  • July 27
  • 30 days
  • August 27
  • Rs 2 crore

Why this matters

Any partnership, acquisition or commercial diligence involving Blinkit should scrutinise IP-rights controls, marketing approvals and indemnity coverage.

What to watch

  • Blinkit's court filing, including whether it disputes use, ownership, authorization, or damages.
  • Any interim injunction, takedown order, preservation direction, or undertaking recorded by the Delhi High Court.
  • Whether Zee expands claims to Zomato, third-party agencies, influencers, or additional Blinkit campaigns.
  • Evidence of a settlement, music-licensing arrangement, or public revision of Blinkit's social-media creative.
  • Similar copyright notices or claims from music labels, studios, publishers, or collecting societies against quick-commerce advertisers.
  • Changes in Blinkit's campaign cadence or increased use of original audio, licensed libraries, and non-music-led promotions.
  • Remove, archive, or geo-restrict the allegedly infringing Instagram promotions pending legal review.
  • Conduct a cross-platform audit of music, clips, memes, creator posts, and agency-produced assets used in paid and organic campaigns.
  • Centralize music licensing records and require pre-publication rights-clearance signoff for social and influencer marketing.
  • Engage Zee on a commercial resolution while preparing a Delhi High Court response within the required period.
  • Review advertising-agency and influencer contracts for indemnities, approval workflows, and responsibility for music rights.

Also reported by