Bharat Taxi faces coercion allegations as Uber, Rapido rides are disrupted in Gujarat

Passengers and drivers in Ahmedabad and Gandhinagar allege they were pressured to cancel Uber and Rapido trips and switch to Bharat Taxi. The claims are unverified, with police intervention awaited; drivers also cite fare disputes, low bookings and disruptions lasting about 15 days.

— Source publishedSat, 26 Sept, 2026, 19:11 IST·First seen Sat, 26 Sept, 2026, 20:08 IST·Source Inc42

What happened

Passengers and drivers in Ahmedabad and Gandhinagar alleged coercion to cancel Uber and Rapido rides and switch to Bharat Taxi. Claims remain unverified; police

Key facts

  • 10-15 people allegedly surrounded a vehicle
  • Minimum five shares worth ₹500 required for Bharat Taxi drivers
  • ₹5 lakh insurance cover
  • Drivers said disruptions had continued for 15 days

Why this matters

Any mobility partnership or expansion assessment in Gujarat should account for heightened local execution risk, including driver-network friction, fare disputes and potential enforcement uncertainty.

What to watch

  • Registration of an FIR, police statement, detentions, or a formal transport-department inquiry.
  • Sustained increases in Uber or Rapido cancellation rates, ETA times, surge pricing, or driver offline hours in Ahmedabad and Gandhinagar.
  • Verified videos, ride screenshots, driver testimonies, or platform notices showing coordinated trip disruption.
  • Public response or operational changes from Bharat Taxi, Uber, Rapido, driver unions, or local taxi associations.
  • Expansion of allegations beyond the reported areas or beyond the roughly 15-day disruption window.
  • Airport, railway-station, hotel, or major-event pickup restrictions that could indicate broader mobility spillover.
  • Uber and Rapido are likely to collect trip-level disruption evidence, contact affected drivers, adjust incentives in Ahmedabad and Gandhinagar, and escalate complaints to local authorities.
  • Bharat Taxi may issue a denial, distance itself from alleged coercive conduct, or pursue driver and rider acquisition messaging to protect its local position.
  • Platforms may introduce safety alerts, cancellation compensation, pickup-zone monitoring, and temporary rider promotions to preserve demand.
  • Local police and transport authorities may seek CCTV footage, driver statements, platform logs, and evidence of organized interference before acting publicly.
  • Corporate users, hotels, airports, and delivery-linked mobility buyers may diversify transport arrangements if ride reliability deteriorates.

Also reported by