JSW puts India battery-cell plans on hold as it seeks LFP technology partner

JSW Group has paused its battery-cell manufacturing plans in India while it looks for access to LFP technology, underscoring the auto sector’s reliance on Chinese cell supply. China accounted for 84% of India’s Rs 41,667 crore lithium-ion cell imports in FY26.

— Source publishedThu, 27 Aug, 2026, 20:34 IST·First seen Thu, 27 Aug, 2026, 20:45 IST·Source Business Today · Latest

What happened

JSW Group has paused India battery-cell manufacturing plans until it secures LFP technology, largely controlled by China. The report highlights India’s

Key facts

  • India's lithium-ion cell imports rose 64% year-on-year to Rs 41,667 crore in FY26
  • China accounted for 84% of India's lithium-ion cell imports
  • Rs 18,100-crore ACC Production Linked Incentive scheme
  • 40 GWh battery-cell capacity awarded under the scheme
  • Ola Cell Technologies received 20 GWh allocation
  • Reliance Industries received 15 GWh allocation
  • Agratas is setting up a 20 GWh plant

Why this matters

JSW’s search creates an opening for LFP technology licensing, joint ventures and strategic supply alliances with non-Chinese cell makers seeking a foothold in India.

What to watch

  • A disclosed JSW technology partner, licensing agreement, JV structure or revised cell-plant timeline.
  • Commissioning dates, yield disclosures and OEM customer wins from Agratas, Reliance, Amara Raja and Exide.
  • Changes in India's battery-cell import mix, particularly China's share and imports of LFP cells versus packs.
  • New tariffs, quality-control rules, PLI disbursements or localization requirements affecting imported cells and battery packs.
  • Long-term cell supply contracts between Indian OEMs and Chinese, Korean or domestic producers.
  • Evidence that Indian-made cells reach cost and performance parity with imported LFP cells.
  • JSW is likely to prioritize LFP technology licensing, joint-venture discussions or a contract-manufacturing arrangement before recommitting major cell-plant capital.
  • Indian EV makers may extend cell supply agreements with Chinese battery producers while diversifying through Korean, Japanese and emerging domestic suppliers.
  • Battery companies with active Indian cell programs may seek binding OEM offtake contracts to improve project financing and accelerate commissioning.
  • Automakers may favor LFP-based mass-market models and redesign packs around available imported cell formats, slowing supplier localization decisions.
  • Policymakers may face pressure to shift from capacity incentives alone toward technology-transfer, equipment, mineral-processing and battery-recycling support.