On this page

Snabbit's Q2 FY27 NTV of Rs 72 crore edges Urban Company's InstaHelp at Rs 71 crore, with a lower cash burn

Our read

Snabbit logged 6.4 million orders against InstaHelp's 6.2 million in Q2 FY27, so quick home services operators face two rivals at near-equal scale, with NTV of Rs 72 crore and Rs 71 crore.

Watch

InstaHelp revenue growth against the 82% quarter-on-quarter rise in Q2 FY27

The report,

Snabbit burned Rs 142 crore in the quarter, against an adjusted EBITDA loss of Rs 174 crore at Urban Company's InstaHelp. The two measures may not be comparable.

  • Urban Company: +41% revenue
  • Lemon Tree Hotels: +10 hotels, 4,000 keys

Reported figures

From the report. Source details below

Snabbit Q2 FY27 orders: 6.4 million
InstaHelp Q2 FY27 orders: 6.2 million
InstaHelp Q2 FY27 revenue: Rs 20.37 crore
InstaHelp revenue growth quarter-on-quarter: 82%

Why it matters to operators

Snabbit's 6.4 million orders in Q2 FY27 sit just ahead of InstaHelp's 6.2 million, so quick home services has two near-equal scaled players to benchmark against for any partnership or comparison.

What to watch next

  • Snabbit's NTV above ₹72 crore in the Q3 FY27 results would mean its edge over InstaHelp's ₹71 crore is widening, leaving Urban Company to defend share.
  • Snabbit cash burn below ₹142 crore in the Q3 FY27 results
  • Urban Company disclosing InstaHelp losses on a basis comparable to Snabbit's burn
  • Any Snabbit funding announcement before the Q3 FY27 results

Likely next moves

Our read of what comes next — analysis, not reported by the source.

  • Snabbit is likely to keep spending on supply and customer acquisition to defend its thin NTV lead, which keeps its ₹142 crore burn under investor scrutiny.
  • Urban Company is likely to keep scaling InstaHelp, given revenue of ₹20.37 crore and 82% quarter-on-quarter growth, and may accept a wide loss to close the gap.
  • Snabbit may look for fresh funding or investor backing to sustain expansion at its current burn rate.
  • Expect Snabbit and InstaHelp to compete on worker incentives and availability, which could lift service-partner payouts and squeeze unit economics at both.
  • Customers are likely to keep using both apps, which limits either firm's pricing power in quick home services.

The source

Source Read the source at Entrackr Published

First seen