Urban Company's InstaHelp posts Rs 174 crore adjusted EBITDA loss on Rs 20.37 crore revenue in Q2 FY27

Our read

InstaHelp's ₹279 loss per order is more likely to narrow than widen over the next two quarters, but the group is unlikely to stop funding it.

For operators

Urban Company's InstaHelp lost Rs 279 per order on 6.2 million orders at a net order value of Rs 114, so operators weighing quick home services face that per-order loss as the benchmark.

Watch

InstaHelp order count against the 6.2 million in Q2 FY27

The report,

Urban Company reported Rs 527 crore operating revenue in Q2 FY27, up 41% year-on-year, while losses widened threefold to Rs 182 crore. Its InstaHelp quick home services vertical posted a Rs 174 crore adjusted EBITDA loss on Rs 20.37 crore revenue and 6.2 million orders.

InstaHelp's Q2 FY27 loss set against its revenue, order volume and per-order loss
Adjusted EBITDA loss
₹174 crore
Revenue
₹20.37 crore
Orders
6.2 million
Adjusted EBITDA loss per order
₹279
Embed

Paste this HTML where the chart should go. It shows the current chart and links back to the report.

Download PNG

Newer report , , The Hindu BusinessLine : Urban Company's loss widens in Q2 FY27 results; Crompton Greaves posts profit growth in the same roundup

07:30 IST · 10 moves · what each means · free

Reported figures

From the report. Source details below

InstaHelp adjusted EBITDA loss per order: Rs 279

Why it matters to operators

InstaHelp lost Rs 174 crore adjusted EBITDA on Rs 20.37 crore revenue in Q2 FY27, so Urban Company investors see group net loss widen threefold to Rs 182 crore while operating revenue rose 41% to Rs 527 crore.

What to watch next

  • InstaHelp loss per order below the ₹279 reported for Q2 FY27, in the Q3 FY27 results, would mean quick-service burn is peaking and core margins are safe.
  • Net order value against the ₹114 reported for Q2
  • Group net loss against Q2's ₹182 crore in the next results
  • Management comment on a spending cap or new-city pause for InstaHelp

The source

Source Read the source at Entrackr Published

First seen